September, 2014 Newsletter
BARGAINING
The Association team has met with the Administration team 4 times so far. Two of these meetings were joint training sessions to learn the methods of “Interest Based Bargaining,” which emphasizes identifying mutual interests, a variety of options and alternative solutions, and consensus decision making. The Association team has also been meeting separately to discuss issues confronting Faculty and the campus and possible areas of mutual interest for discussion at the bargaining table. We have drafted a bargaining platform, which is attached to this email. We look forward to a cordial and constructive bargaining process for our successor agreement.
GRIEVANCES
Faculty Association grievance representatives have had several successes enforcing the SIUC Faculty’s contractual rights. Some cases were brought to resolution through meetings with the Administration; others have advanced to arbitration, where FA reps and our local IEA staff have had an excellent record.
The FA has successfully resolved or settled several workload cases without arbitration (in CASA Science, COEHS, and Library Affairs), where operating paper rules or the contract’s 24 credit hour equivalency rule have been violated. Resolutions have included restoring release from teaching duties for program directors and enforcing workload limits. FA grievance representatives and the IEA staff also won a COLA workload grievance through arbitration: the arbitrator found that a chair, who had singled out a faculty member for a disparate workload assignment, acted in an arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory manner in violation of the fundamental principles of due process. The Faculty member was awarded back salary for the course overloads.
Other arbitration resolutions include a case where the arbitrator found that then Provost Nicklow acted arbitrarily when he ignored arrangements already approved by the chair and dean, and forced a Faculty member to take unpaid leave before authorizing outside employment to deliver a series of lectures overseas. The Faculty member was awarded back pay. An arbitrator has also ruled that Chancellor Cheng violated the contract when she engaged in consultations with the Provost over a promotion and tenure case that was later subject to the Chancellor’s review following the decision of the Judicial Review Board. Other issues in this grievance are still pending with the arbitrator.
Finally, in addition to the furlough ULP, a Faculty member has won a cash award for another Unfair Labor Practice charge. In this case, the Labor Board found that the Administration violated the Labor Act when a dean singled out the Faculty member for his union activity and denied him an interim chair position.
These victories were possible because the affected Faculty members came to the FA in time for us to initiate a grievance within the contractual time limit of 30 days following the action or decision in question. Our grievance victories also depend on having a contract that provides the rights we defend. As we negotiate our next agreement, this is the time to get involved in establishing and maintaining these rights, so that they are there when we need them.
CREDIT HOUR EQUIVALENCY BARGAINING
The FA continues to bargain Credit Hour Equivalencies (CHE) for departments that don’t currently have them in their operating papers. We’ve completed two amendments thus far and have made some headway on others. We’re hoping to make more progress as the new administration settles in. Currently we are discussing the issue of the total amount of credit someone receives for the life of a task (ex: advising a graduate student through a PhD). The CHE team is led by Dr. Jyotsna Kapur of Cinema and Photography.
President, SIUC Faculty Association